The Tube Project:

  • Author: altoidyoda
  • Views: 1190937 views
  • Rating:
  • Category: News
  • *ONE FRAME BEFORE THE FATAL HEAD SHOT See the driver? Yup, that's right... NO GUN! This is for the select few who actually think the driver had something to do with the assassination. I don't think they bother to read the comments, so I am posting this video to show exactly how stupid the idea is. (Oh, and sorry about the background noise) ================================== If anyone is still skeptical, go here. It covers everything in detail. http://www.jfklancer.com/greer.html I don't agree with everything said on the rest of that site, but they do a good job discussing the "driver theory". ================================== This is frame 312 of the Zapruder film, one frame before the fatal head shot. Here is the full frame http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z312.jpg Here's the original site showing every frame of the Zapruder film http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/ This is the image I used (if you want the picture in full resolution, send me a private message with your e-mail) http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/frame_312.jpg Here is the close-up of the driver in the original resolution. http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/driver_close-up.jpg (This is just a temporary description, I will write a better (less angry) one once I get my thoughts together on the subject) I've been discussing the assassination for the past couple of weeks and I keep seeing comments that claim that the driver fired the fatal shot. Can you believe that? That someone would actually think that the driver, in front of hundreds of witnesses, could pull out a gun and shoot the president in the head without anyone noticing? It is beyond me how someone could be so stupid to make that claim. But what's even worse is how people will look at that video and actually believe it's true. I've been amazed at what I've heard over the past two weeks. It's amazing to think that someone could give credit to any conspiracy theory, let alone something like this. This theory should be filed right next to the 'coughing up the bullet' idea, right into the trash. These people are worse than the average conspiracy theorists. Those guys will at least attempt to show some evidence (however stupid it is) to prove their point. These people, on the other hand, will just make stuff up, then they have the gull to argue over it, as if it's a real possibility. Well I've got a theory of my own, and I can prove it... Oswald did it! Alone. 3 shots from the 6th floor window. All the evidence supports it and if you refuse to believe the facts then you're not worth the time it takes to prove you wrong. And that's the thing, they wont be proven wrong. They didn't come to their conclusion rationally so no information will ever change their minds. That's the difference between a skeptic and a conspiracy theorist. One wants to know the answers, the other wants to be right. ...so anyway, this video is just to show people that a low resolution video on YouTube can't be used as a basis for their crackpot theories. It is a enlarged section of frame 312 of the Zapruder film, showing the driver, both his hands, and the glare of the guys head. Now that you've all seen this you can stop annoying me with stupid comments. This is a link comparing the frame I show to the same frame in the video, "JFK Assassination: Watch The Limo Driver" http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/frame_312_comp.jpg And this is a link comparing the frame I show to the same frame William Cooper shows in the video, "Did The Driver Shoot JFK?". http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r220/altoidyoda/sidebyside2.jpg This video shows object moving towards the shot when struck by a bullet. http://www.zippyvideos.com/6161942937722266/physics_at_work
    Get Well Soon Jenny Maguire
    Avocet3D Images 3D rendering and animation
    Get Well Soon Jenny Maguire
    Your Golf Stats Personal Golf Statistics
    Your Golf Stats Personal Golf Statistics
    Get Well Soon Jenny Maguire
    Get Well Soon Jenny Maguire
  • Author: Kareem4i
  • Views: 287834 views
  • Rating:
  • Category: News
  • Advertise of the Tube Project
  • Author: PaddyIrishMan2
  • Views: 284011 views
  • Rating:
  • Category: People
  • President John F. Kennedy's inaugural address, January 20th 1961. Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens, we observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom — symbolising an end, as well as a beginning — signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three quarters ago. The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans — born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage — and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world. Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge and more. To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United, there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided, there is little we can do — for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder. To those new States whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom — and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside. To those peoples in the huts and villages across the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge — to convert our good words into good deeds — in a new alliance for progress — to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbours know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this Hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house. To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support — to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective — to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak — and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run. Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction. We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed. But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course — both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war. So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate. Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belabouring those problems which divide us. Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms — and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.